Hello,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> On 21/12/16 17:46, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 12/21/2016 11:33 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 21/12/16 17:02, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:11 AM Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 20/12/16 17:36, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> I am. You could have written a mail highlighting some examples why this
>>> warnings is useful, you could have started a branch with it enabled and
>>> worked together with Chris and Cedric on it to fix the warnings. Nothing
>>> of this happened. Out of the blue this warning was enabled and a rush of
>>> patches came in. You should not be surprised that people bring this up.
>>
>> The "rush" of patches coming in was mainly because I HATE COMPILER
>> WARNINGS :) and wanted to get some of them fixed. Would you have
>
> Over 40 of them have been from Cedric. Its not all about you hating
> compiler warnings. :)

Yeah, I am also full of hatred for those too. I know I should get some
councelling on it one day, but squashing them felt good to !
-- 
Cedric BAIL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to