Hello. On 04/09/2017 09:52 AM, Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi, > > In general principle I would agree with you - everything we release should > be of the top quality and there should never be a known regression. > > But then there is the context: we are now 4 months behind the original > release date for 1.19. Anyone relying on our new apis or enhancements > cannot release until we do and so I think that puts pressure up over time > to release. Additionally we are able to get people to focus on bug fixing > and testing for a couple of weeks to a month but at this point (according > to my observations) most people are fed up of that and drifting off. Not > only does that mean that the release slips further but, as we are in > feature freeze, it means that valuable contributions are also falling > behind and potentially being missed.
This does describe the procedure quite well. :) The pain is almost over now as I prepare the tarballs for 1.19 :) regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel