On 11.05.2017 22:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:20 +0900 Florian Schaefer <[email protected]> said:
> 
>>
>> On 11.05.2017 12:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 May 2017 09:48:19 +0200 PaulTT <[email protected]> said:
>>>
>>>> i just posted a message about this... (sorry, i've seen now this thread)
>>>>
>>>> as i said there, there's also a problem with unlocking (so, pam related, i
>>>> assume ?)
>>>> via console su and sudo worked like a charm (i've got error messages about
>>>> cpufreq and backlight too)
>>>
>>> pam would be executing a setuid root binary to do the password check... so
>>> it's the same issue. something has decided that e and app processes below
>>> it in the process tree "cant run setuid (root) binaries" and has disabled
>>> that feature. that feature seems to only kick in with 4.11 kernel. it
>>> certainly is not e doing this. it has relied on this working for many
>>> years. it's something new security-wise that is being enabled by a new
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>> maybe some parent process is using setpriv? CAP_SETUID  disabled? man
>>> capabilities ... for info ... maybe run captest ?
>>> e
>>> 12:20PM ~ > captest
>>> User  credentials uid:1000 euid:1000 suid:1000
>>> Group credentials gid:1000 egid:1000 sgid:1000
>>> Current capabilities: none
>>> securebits flags: none
>>> Attempting direct access to shadow...FAILED (Permission denied)
>>> Attempting to access shadow by child process...FAILED
>>> Child User  credentials uid:1000 euid:1000 suid:1000
>>> Child Group credentials gid:1000 egid:1000 sgid:1000
>>> Child capabilities: none
>>> Child securebits flags: none
>>>
>>> is what i get. which is normal.
>>
>> I get the same as you on my system here:
>>
>> florian@washu:~ # uname -a
>> Linux washu 4.11.0 #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 2 12:12:51 JST 2017 i686 GNU/Linux
>> florian@washu:~ # captest
>> User  credentials uid:500 euid:500 suid:500
>> Group credentials gid:100 egid:100 sgid:100
>> Current capabilities: none
>> securebits flags: none
>> Attempting direct access to shadow...FAILED (Permission denied)
>> Attempting to access shadow by child process...FAILED
>> Child User  credentials uid:500 euid:500 suid:500
>> Child Group credentials gid:100 egid:100 sgid:100
>> Child capabilities: none
>> Child securebits flags: none
> 
> try capsh --print
> ?
> Current: =
> Bounding set
> =cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_linux_immutable,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_broadcast,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_ipc_lock,cap_ipc_owner,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_rawio,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_sys_pacct,cap_sys_admin,cap_sys_boot,cap_sys_nice,cap_sys_resource,cap_sys_time,cap_sys_tty_config,cap_mknod,cap_lease,cap_audit_write,cap_audit_control,cap_setfcap,cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin,cap_syslog,cap_wake_alarm,cap_block_suspend,cap_audit_read
> Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0 secure-noroot: no (unlocked)
>  secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked)
>  secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked)
> uid=1000(raster)
> gid=1000(raster)
> groups=5(tty),6(disk),7(lp),10(wheel),50(games),78(kvm),90(network),91(video),92
> (audio),93(optical),94(floppy),95(storage),96(scanner),98(power),100(users),492
> (oprofile),1000(raster)

Oh, that's a nice command. :-)

florian@washu:~ # /sbin/capsh --print
Current: =
Bounding set
=cap_chown,cap_dac_override,cap_dac_read_search,cap_fowner,cap_fsetid,cap_kill,cap_setgid,cap_setuid,cap_setpcap,cap_linux_immutable,cap_net_bind_service,cap_net_broadcast,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_ipc_lock,cap_ipc_owner,cap_sys_module,cap_sys_rawio,cap_sys_chroot,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_sys_pacct,cap_sys_admin,cap_sys_boot,cap_sys_nice,cap_sys_resource,cap_sys_time,cap_sys_tty_config,cap_mknod,cap_lease,cap_audit_write,cap_audit_control,cap_setfcap,cap_mac_override,cap_mac_admin,cap_syslog,cap_wake_alarm,cap_block_suspend,cap_audit_read
Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0
 secure-noroot: no (unlocked)
 secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked)
 secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked)
uid=500(florian)
gid=100(users)
groups=20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev),100(users),106(camera),108(netdev),119(systemd-journal)

It seems that I have cap_setuid. That's good, right?

Cheers,
Florian


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to