Hi, Hey andy: just tested it, works here, there is just a strange resize issue with a popup which is completly collapsed in the middle of my screen, but nothing locks up...
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 12:36:38AM +0100, Al Poole wrote: > I feel strongly that the new gadget system and the bryce should be in it > own branch definitely not in master because it's changing a lot and it's > often broken. I have to say: "no". First of all, take a look how much bryce itself changed over the time, the last api change of bryce was on Mar 8 (take a look at git log!). So saying it is changing a lot is not true. Modules are changing, things are added & there are bug fixes, but huge changes to bryce itself are not happening. Also, lets think a second about what would happen if bryce would be in a branch: - Fewer people would test it, as said in some other ML thread last week, people only test if its easy to build, noone does a test of the "bryce" branch just because you asks him to test it. - Development is quite harder if you are testing now, where should you submit a bugfix that is due to bryce but not in bryce code? master / bryce-branch? - How would you organize rebases the bryce-branch to the latested master? It doesnt matter what you do you end up either with the user rebaseing the branch himself, which sucks, since he would have to resolve merge conflicts he doesnt know, or you are annoying the others developing on bryce stuff since you are rebasing stuff and they cannot just simply do a git pull and be up to date - [... This list can be continued] So all in all, it does not make any sense to keep it in a branch. I use it daily and never encountered a real break where i had to stop using bryce, and even if i find some bug in it, it usally takes max. 7 days for mike /okra to fix it. Greetings bu5hm4n > > E is really the main reason I was attracted to the whole project and I > think this is common. Sometimes it feels like it's an afterthought. > > Does anyone really know what is happening with E and the future of it??? > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Al Poole <nets...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes also, when I move an existing gadget this happens: > > > > http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-597bb445815632.03771636.jpg > > > > It would be good to know the state of the Bryce and gadgets also??? From > > IRC discussions sounded like there were major changes again??? I don;t know > > but it would be good to know! > > > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I tried updating today and found that if I add a bryce the wizard locks up > >> hard after clicking Finished on page 4/4. Does anyone else see this? > >> > >> Can someone confirm when Bryce is supposed to replace the old gadget api > >> as > >> I'm not sure yet if I should be reporting these as showstopper issues? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Andy > >> -- > >> http://andywilliams.me > >> http://ajwillia.ms > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ------------------ > >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > >> _______________________________________________ > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel