2017-09-26 8:21 GMT+09:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@gmail.com>:
> then we should have an equivalent of a constructor for a mixin? as you > said, eventually "initialize to 0" is not good enough > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Cedric Bail <ced...@ddlm.me> wrote: > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force > initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd. > >> Local Time: September 23, 2017 11:39 AM > >> UTC Time: September 23, 2017 6:39 PM > >> From: barbi...@gmail.com > >> To: Enlightenment developer list <enlightenment-devel@lists. > sourceforge.net> > >> > >> This is not right. You can use only -1 and you can use the constructor. > > > > It is a mixin that doesn't inherit from Efl.Object, so I can't see a way > to use the constructor there. The problem of the initialization being 0, > means that you end up with the possibility that a non initialized object > will close fd 0 at fork time without owning that fd at all. > Just inherit from Efl.Object as an interface (ie. not the 1st class). There is Efl.Interface if you need to inherit from a dummy interface. Constructors work fine with mixins. -- Jean-Philippe André ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
