ah! so it's not my auto* versions that are wrong (as suggested by bojan). thanx anyway


Michael Jennings wrote:


On Monday, 31 March 2003, at 14:31:49 (+0200),
Wim de Jonge wrote:



i just wanted to note something about compiling imlib2 (1.06). i
couldn't get it to compile, and it turned out that i had to go to
each separate directory and do a make - make install in each of them
(that is, first libltdl/, then src/, and then loaders/).

might be of help for novices who cannot get imlib2 to compile. i'm
not a developer, but isn't there a way to solve this?



This is a known issue. In the past, most people have either built and installed an older version first, then built and installed the 1.0.6 version, or they've found a package for the older version and then built the newer one.

The problem is this:  The parts of that tarball which require linking
with Imlib2 used -lImlib2 instead of pointing to the src/ directory
for it.  I just committed a fix to CVS which should alleviate this
problem, so hopefully it will go away with the next version.
(Assuming no Debian people come along and break stuff again....)  :)

Michael






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to