On Wednesday, 10 September 2003, at 12:26:53 (-0400), Bradley Reed wrote: > A shame.
I agree. This is one of the many reasons I despise RMS' politics. > Thanks for the link. I take it then that enlightenment is considered > non-free? I never would have guessed that from reading the COPYING > file in the enlightenment tarball. The presence of a COPYING file means nothing. If you look at the source code, you'll see it's licensed under the BSD license, not the GPL. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I don't know what will be used in the next world war, but the fourth will be fought with stones." -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
