On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 18:01:01 (+0100), Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > Sorry, but I can see their point. No UTF-8, no tabs.
Incorrect. First off, aterm and wterm don't have tabs either. Secondly, Eterm DOES HAVE TABS. As for UTF-8, I don't own or run a single system where I haven't forceably changed the default locale from UTF-8 back to C, and it has nothing to do with lack of support in Eterm. UTF-8 has proven to be nothing but a royal pain in the ass across the board. > Just unable to compete with the current state of gnome-terminal, for > one. Absurd. Other than GUI-based configuration and UTF-8, there's nothing gnome-terminal offers over Eterm. Unless you're one of those people who likes to be able to get coffee while you wait for your terminal to scroll. > I switched over a year ago and see no reason to go back. If E as a > total package was still seen as a major-league environment, rather > than as a better WM for Gnome or KDE, then ETerm might make sense. > But until E0.17 is ready, I don't see much point in it. Thank you for sharing Sun's opinion. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Greater than the death of flesh is the death of hope, the death of dreams. Against this peril we can never surrender." -- G'Kar, Babylon 5 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
