On Tuesday, 15 March 2005, at 09:12:51 (+0800), Didier Casse wrote: > libpcre.la should technically be installed by the pcre-devel package.
Not necessarily. Depends on the packaging. > It might be that libpcre.a and libpcre.la are just the same files. If > I shoot an arrow in the dark I would probably go for a: > > ln -s /usr/lib/libpcre.a /usr/lib/libpcre.la > /sbin/ldconfig Nope. The .la file is actually a text file which has dependency information for the library. > and try! Unless Michael Jennings has some other theory about it. Some other library has a .la file which refers to libpcre's .la file. The trick is finding and removing it. I'd recommend rebuilding imlib2, libast, and Eterm. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
