Most (if not all) of e17 appears to be in Standard C.

Now, as someone who recently (6 months ago) started learning C++, I
can tell you if you don't know either C or C++ you should really
consider learning C++. If you learn C++ you're also learning a lot of
C (after all C is just "C improved").
C++ also gives you a lot of tools to make things easier than Standard
C as far as my (albeit limited) knowledge of the subjects can see...

Anyways, after you've learned most of the basic concepts (should only
take a couple of good nights of reading books) you will know enough to
read (and follow) most of the e sourcecode - and just learn from there
and read the documentation on the different core modules.

Of course I could be completely wrong about this as I haven't written
anything for e yet.

On Fri,
19 Aug 2005 04:58:33 +0200 Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> What computer-lang should I pick in order to write e apps? What's most
> efficient? I feel like learning C, but not C++.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams
> * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
> http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users
> mailing list [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to