On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:51:26 +0200 Martin Zwickel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:30:28 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled:
> 
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:53:07 +0200 ilLogict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> > 
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > I always had the same problem on my box. But on amd64, this is set
> > > as gcc's default. Do anyone know how to bypass it so that it won't
> > > be used?
> > 
> > man gcc. as for the sse fp math... it (from memory) makes gcc use the
> > sse instruction set to do floating point math operations. this is
> > likely a bad thing as it 1. means using the "mmx unit" and swapping
> > out of fp mode and thus you have a cycle hit with an emms coming back
> > in - as the fp ops are short and not all over this isn't much worth
> > it. i suspect there is some conversion rounding cumulative error. but
> > as i dont have an amd64 i cant tell you much more than what i suspect.
> > :)
> 
> Maybe you can disable the option in the specs file?!

that is not our job - to dictate build flag policy. that's the job of the
builder. :) we provide a SAMPLe .spec file for building rpm's - it's nto a
final thing. it's intended to help packagers build off.

> -- 
> MyExcuse:
> incompatible bit-registration operators
> 
> Martin Zwickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Research & Development
> 
> TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to