On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:53:08PM -0500, RockerZ71 wrote:
> Is there no way to have the scrollwheel still change desktops when the 
> pointer 
> is over the desktop and also cycle through the windows in engage when the 
> pointer is inside the module?

I've played a bit more with this (thanks for the enlightenment_remote
output you sent - that was exactly what I was after).

Basically, the answer's no. I've tried adding wheel bindings for each
context in turn, and either they don't flip desktops at all, or they
override window cycling in engage.

The closest I can get is to add a shift+wheel binding for flipping
desktops. Then the wheel without shift when the mouse is over engage
will still cycle through windows:

enlightenment_remote -binding-wheel-del CONTAINER 0 1 SHIFT 0 \
  desk_linear_flip_by 1

enlightenment_remote -binding-wheel-del CONTAINER 0 -1 SHIFT 0 \
  desk_linear_flip_by -1

You can also do this the other way round if you prefer by replacing
SHIFT with NONE: the wheel on its own will flip desktops, and
shift+wheel (or in fact any modifier+wheel combination) when over
engage will cycle windows.

I still can't work out what all the CONTEXTs mean. I can't find any
difference when I use ALL instead of CONTAINER in the above, for
example. And what are ZONE and MANAGER? (I think I can guess the
rest...)

Anyway, HTH,

Toby
-- 
PhD Student
Quantum Information Theory group
Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics
Garching, Germany

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.dr-qubit.org


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to