On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:59:50 -0400 Christopher Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 15:03:32 +0200 "Florent THIERY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> > 
> >>>> 2 strangers eyeing each other over their drinks and making smalltalk, and
> >>>> wondering if tonight they;ll get lucky.
> >> I get the picture :)
> >>
> >> But this was a real question; as ecore handles the ipc stuff inside
> >> e17, e17 is absolutely unrelated to Dbus?
> > 
> > dbus is not a requirement for e17 - 
> 
> Are we sure of this? :) Last time I tried to build ecore without dbus 
> support (which did build), but E did not in this case...something todo 
> with e_fm.

ecore_dbus is a requirement - dbus is not. you don't need the dbus daemon
running for e to work. ecore_dbus builds by default - UNLESS you disable it.
ecore_dbus has no external requirements last i checked.

> currently it does make use of it for HAL
> > support and getting events when a removable storage device is plugged in or
> > removed - that's it. you simply lose the auto-icon generation on plug in and
> > out.
> 
> dh
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to