Hi, On Nov 10, 2007 10:07 PM, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:46:44PM +0100, Michel BRIAND wrote: > > Hi, > Hi > > > > Fist, your involvement and wisdom as team leader is respected and > > appreciated ! > > > > Ulisses said: > > >Formalising can be a good thing, I think. We could even try to change > > >our workflow and start using git. What do you think? > > > > > > > Yes, git is a good trade, everyone noticed that CVS is so slow, and > > that's prevented devs from tagging releases in the past. > Don't see why people want's to push git, cvs is working and i guess we > have better things to do than changing the source management software.
Yes, CVS is working and that's exactly what keeps people not seeing how better we would be with git. Being able to commit locally, create branches to work on separate features and be able to merge afterwards and so on. Once you work with git you notice how things could be really easier and how painful it is to work with CVS. Like I said before we'd have to change our workflow to enjoy all the benefits of the decentralized nature of git. However, talking to Raster (on IRC) he had a very strong opinion of staying with CVS or changing to SVN (unlikely, though). Regards, -- Ulisses ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
