I have been keeping fairly recent .debs built of Enlightenment for Ubuntu, they might work with Debian as well (haven't tried personally). They are hosted at packages.bodhilinux.com
Cheers, ~Jeff Hoogland ----- Original message ----- > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:07:12 +0100 Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> said: > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:05:40 -0300 Wido <[email protected]> said: > > > > BTW, who maintains that repository? I would be glad to lend my > > > > unused CPU cicles to compile the DEB packages (with help on how > > > > to, because I never really did that), so everybody can have fresh > > > > packages with every new snapshot or version > > > > > > compiling packages isn't a problem. frankly i rebuild all of efl+e > > > +elementary +enjoy+a pile of other things in under 10 mins > > > (5-10mins). i do it generally 2 or 3 times per day. the problem is > > > someone has to go manually change debian packaging metadata files > > > for every library, binary etc. etc. that they build and that > > > involves editing 1 or more files per package... and that assumes you > > > have working debian build metadata files already. if you don't, > > > you'll have to create them. > > > > > > i thought lutin and quaker were actively handling debian and/or > > > ubuntu packages. in fact... what is going on? at least the last > > > packaged stuff for ubuntu seems to be rev 49898. i see some traffic > > > early november for accepting beta 1 into debian experimental. > > > elementary seems to have been rejected. we've done beta2 and are > > > pushing onto a beta3 by now. this is pretty slow. i'm wondering if > > > it's not just time to have an apt repository of our own we can just > > > automate builds for... we have old old old packaging stuff lutin and > > > quaker did up to snap 063... > > > > > > quaker - lutin - any comments? to me, at least, it seems we'd be > > > better off with our own apt repo? > > > > > From what I understand, Lutin can't move EFL package out of > > experimental until we do a release due to some Debian rules. I think > > that beta3 package are on their way right now in experimental. beta2 > > are missing because at the time of the release Lutin did have a lot of > > real life work to do. > > experiemntal has accepted beta2, not beta3 :) > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > WikiLeaks The End of the Free Internet > http://p.sf.net/sfu/therealnews-com > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
