On 02/06/2011 06:22 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:25:08 +1000 David Seikel<[email protected]> said: > >> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:08:29 -0600 Jeff Hoogland >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Recompiling everything versus just the new packages is a huge time >>> difference when I am building them all into .deb packages. >> >> Would have been less time than the time taken to wait for an answer on >> this list though. That was my first point. >> >> My second point still stands, the general recommendation is to compile >> everything from a clean state. See an email a short time ago from >> raster about why a compile failed. >> >> I compile absolutely everything from scratch each time. Only takes >> half an hour on a cheap system. > > my compiles are down to the sub 6 minute range (including: make clean > distclean&& ./autogen.sh&& make&& sudo make install) .and i build: > > e17 > ecore > e_dbus > edje > eet > eeze > efreet > eina > eio > elementary > embryo > emotion > enjoy > ephoto > ethumb > evas > exalt-client > exalt > expedite > exquisite > lightmediascanner > > trying to remove something from the compile simply isnt worth the time. you > may > want to re-examine your build process entirely if its taking too long on any > vaguely modern system. >
Are you using ccache? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these rules translate into the virtual world? http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
