On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:43:38 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> said:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:32:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:17:06 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> > > said: > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:58:38 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:44:57 +1000 David Seikel > > > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > > > > I can't answer all your questions, but I have some answers for > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:15:33 -0200 Silas Silva > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I may try using ELF. > > > > > > > > > > It's EFL, Enlightenment Foundation Libraries, you got it right > > > > > in the subject though. > > > > > > > > > > > 1. What exactly the fact the ELF is LGPL means for developing > > > > > > proprietary applications? May I link it statically? (Oh, > > > > > > after some time back in the development world, need to re-read > > > > > > licenses...) > > > > > > > > > > Most of EFL is BSD licensed. Some parts are LGPL though. I > > > > > think there is a mix of LGPL 2.1 and 3. > > > > > > > > we have lgpl 3 in core efl? c++ bindings are lgpl3. > > > > > > > > i guess epdf might be lgpl3 is you use the mupdf renderer. as > > > > such for libraries we have released or now have beta's of they > > > > are either bsd-2 clause or lgpl-2. > > > > > > I just did a grep. Looks like you are correct. > > > > > > Ethumbd is not really core, but it's LGPL 3. I knew one snuck in > > > somewhere. > > > > it looks lgpl 2.1 to me - looking at COPYING in ethumb. i don't see > > any copyright claim to the contract in ethumbd src... > > trunk/ethumb/src/bin/ethumbd.c has, starting on line 6 - > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify it > * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as > published by > * the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or > (at your > * option) any later version. oh there it is! i skimmed that quickly. as such there is no actual copyright notice for gplv3 in the src tree - that kind of needs to be done and that means copying needs to have gplv3 appended, or this needs to become gplv2 then. > At least on my copy. Says version 3 to me, but my new glasses are one > month overdue. > > > now is probably a good time to discuss licensing here. the above have > > not come under the spotlight (yet) because they aren't core or > > required. when they do... we'll have to figure this out. > > True. but probably better discussed on the dev mailing list. aye squiddie > -- > A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants > coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
