https://phab.enlightenment.org/phame/live/1/post/eet_compared_with_json_eet_comes_out_on_top/

---------------------------------------------------------
Given the mainstream can't figure out what to use (XML, JSON... what's next?),
Eet manages to lead hands-down when compared to JSON

Summary:

Data files can be between 4 and 860 TIMES larger with JSON.
Cold read time for JSON is 10 TIMES slower than Eet.
Cold writes take 40% longer with JSON than with Eet.
Hot reads are 7 TIMES slower with JSON than with Eet.
Hot writes take 37% longer with JSON than with Eet.

XML will be between 18 and 26 TIMES slower than Eet at loading config.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and 
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, 
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. 
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to