On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 +0000 Mick <[email protected]> said:

> On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> > >> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore to use
> > >> ZFS.  zfsonlinux solves this.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the info, but why should we need this ? I see no valid
> > > reason.
> 
> There are out-of-tree Linux kernel modules care of ZFSOnLinux Project[1].  
> Therefore using ZFS-Fuse is not necessary (or recommended).  At least one 
> valid reason for using ZFS (there are many) is that it guards against fs 
> corruption by using CRC checksums.
> 
> I understand that both Oracle (RHL) Linux and SUSE consider BTRFS production 
> ready and Oracle will be/are using this instead of ZFS.  From my limited 
> understanding BTRFS is being developed at speed and catching up with ZFS, but 
> it does not have the amount of testing that ZFS had to date to vouch for its 
> stability/maturity.  At this stage in their development ZFS is superior to 
> BTRFS in terms of functionality, although there is hope that BTRFS will 
> develop at speed.

and why? ext4 HAS been production ready for YEARS... inf act not production
ready... it has been *IN8 production for years... if there is a fs i would
trust - it's ext4. not zfs and DEFINITELY not btrfs. ext4 (and 3 etc. before
it) have many more miles of PRODUCTION behind them.

what this probably was ... was an unstable bleeding-edge kernel since the
servers are being run on gentoo and thus are not exactly being conservative. it
was probably a newly introduced bug that hasn't been hammered out and other
fs's used less will have such bugs many times MORE than ext4 will.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to