Hi, Ok, great, keep us posted when it's fixed and thx for the workaround, it worked for me :-)
Emin On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nick Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for raising this. We're aware of the regression in the SHA512SUMS > file, which stems from improvements to our release automation. My colleague > has written a blog post with more details, and a workaround for verifying > hashes: > https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html > > Nick Thomas > Mozilla Release Engineering > > On 28 April 2016 at 21:34, Emin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Whenever I download something I usually check both the digital signature >> and if available the hash of the file the editor provides. >> >> The Mozilla foundation has always provided the hash of files but since >> version 46.0 the win32 hashes for full versions are missing in >> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS >> >> Can you please advise how I should check hashes if I'm doing it the wrong >> way? >> >> Thx >> Emin >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Enterprise mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to >> [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe" >> > >
_______________________________________________ Enterprise mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
