My guess is that it was marked as incompatible because it includes a plugin.
There should probably be a bug opened on this. It should be marked compatible for 52 because it needs to work on the ESR. Mike On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Mossroy <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 30/05/2017 à 13:47, Mossroy a écrit : > > Le 30-05-2017 13:22, James Pearson a écrit : > > Mossroy wrote: > > > Some comments in addons.mozilla.org seem to indicate that it might > simply come from the declared maxVersion in rdf. But, if I modify it, > it breaks the extension signing, so Firefox refuses to install it. > > > Can you install the modified extension if you set > xpinstall.signatures.required' to 'false' ? > > Good idea. > > With this setting, Firefox does not say the extension is corrupted any > more, but still says it is not compatible with Firefox 52.1.2, and refuses > to install it. > > I had put <em:maxVersion>52.*</em:maxVersion> in install.rdf (the > original value was surprisingly 20.0a1, even if it's accepted by Firefox > ESR 45) > > Any idea why this extension is marked as "not compatible with Firefox > 52.1.2" ? I don't see the reason for that. > > Regards, > Mossroy > > _______________________________________________ > Enterprise mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/ > listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe" >
_______________________________________________ Enterprise mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
