Robert Kudyba wrote:
> 
> Is there a difference from using your suggestion vs. what I did here:
> 
> pref("browser.cache.use_new_backend", true);
> pref("browser.cache.disk.enable", false);
> pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 204800);

My suggestion might help if you don't set 
browser.cache.disk.enable=false and browser.cache.memory.capacity - you 
can then use a larger local disk cache i.e. possibly cache more content ...

> If your profile directory is on an NFS share, then you will probably
> want to add:
> 
>   lockPref("storage.nfs_filesystem", true);
> 
> I don’t see if this fixes any performance/speed issues, or does it? I see 
> this: …"led to Firefox functioning incorrectly, for example, navigation 
> buttons not working as expected, and bookmarks not saving"
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/5/html/5.11_technical_notes/known_issues-firefox

Might not make it faster - but probably more stable :-)

James Pearson
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to