On 11/13/2000 7:17 AM, "Allen Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On or near 11/12/00 1:57 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] observed:
>
>> Sorry to trouble everyone, although I'd still be interested in any replies
>> or reflections.
>
> Just a reflection: Emailer used QP, I think, or could send with QP. As can
> Eudora if I recall correctly. And there is a "DecodeQP" osax that used to be
> available on the Westcodesoft.com (OneClick) web site, but--I checked--it
> only <decodes> and does not <encode>. Odd, now that I think of it. Why
> should there be a decoder and not an encoder? <shrug>
I wrote the DecodeQP osax to allow scripts to decode chunks of
quoted-printable that ended up in messages because of non-MIME digests or
other forwarding problems. Entourage uses quoted-printable to encode
extended characters in text, but does not use it for attachments (although
it can decode it).
Dan
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
