Actually I just thought of a workaround. Create a rule that classifies every
message as Junk. You may wish to change the color of the Junk category to
black as well. You'll also need to set the category of every message in your
DB to Junk too. That should do it.
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:29:07 -0500
> To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Address Book Email Address Feature Request
>
> This is the thorn in my side as well. I hope if you arrive at a workaround
> you would be so kind as to share it with me on/off list.
> And if you do, we will then be able to remove eachothers addresses from
our
> address books!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Once upon a time; well...on 12/17/00 12:58 AM, Michael W. Wellman, wrote
> the following....
>
>> I really, really want to be able to specify "defunct" email addresses.
>>
>> And I really, really don't want them to show up in auto-fill address.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>> Well, having personally had professional email addresses including, but
not
>> limited to: atu.edu, uark.edu, hendrix.edu, rice.edu, harc.edu,
>> jsc.nasa.gov, bcm.tmc.edu, uth.tmc.edu, tmc.edu, sccsi.com, houston.edu,
>> motorola.com, amd.com, arizona.edu, intercon.com, aol.com, apple.com,
>> eworld.com, inter.net, interramp.com, svcdudes.com, psi.com, psi.net,
>> ascend.com, lucent.com, and soon agere.com...
>>
>> Suffice it to say that while I like to be sure to categorize all mail
"from"
>> me correctly, I really don't need to see most of those email addresses if
>> I'm cc'ing myself on something.
>>
>>
>> Similarly, parts of my development team, with whom I've worked for nearly
a
>> decade, can have over a dozen different domains depending upon which set
of
>> tangents brought us into the same orbit. And while I like to ensure that
>> old email from them is correctly categorized, I'd much prefer that no
longer
>> valid email addresses show up in the auto-fill list.
>>
>>
>> And we won't even get started on matching:
>> Phil Kearney
>> vs Philip Kearney
>> vs Philip F. Kearney
>> vs Philip F. Kearney III
>>
>> Or, for that matter:
>> ascend.com
>> hrn.ascend.com
>> eng.hrn.ascend.com
>> test.hrn.ascend.com
>> Or the various hosts in each of those subdomains.
>>
>>
>> Of course, I'm tempted to pull out the wayback machine and toss in:
>> ...!nuchat!mikel
>>
>> But then I might have to include the BITNET and/or FidoNet addresses
(hard
>> to believe *that's* still around...).
>>
>> mikel
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To search the archives:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
