Paul Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 3/20/01 8:31 PM: >> >> I don't know how useful naming the signature would be...either as a one-off >> preference on first run, or for each make. > > Well, it has to have a name, It's better than [blank]. it doesn't really > matter until you want to get rid of it or edit it. Then it might be useful > instead of having to open up 100 blank-named signatures. Sorry, I meant as a feature...suggesting that it might be useful to be able to name the signature, or to choose on first-run whether you wanted to auto-name (as is) or be able to name. Ciao. Gary -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
