on 11/20/01 9:07 AM, Christian M. M. Brady at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 11/20/01 1:24 AM, "Harry (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> on 11/19/01 9:43 PM, Christian M. M. Brady at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> None of which make it legal. You are simply trying to justify that which is >>> illegal. >> >> And, just to keep this thread on-topic... the original poster was asking a >> question in which he neither acknowledged using, pirating, or >> inappropriately acquiring an early beta version of Entourage.X. >> >> The question was if the final release was similar to b15 - which could >> indicate that he could have seen the b15 product in a controlled >> environment, and wanted to know what the differences were. >> >> Jumping to an assumption that this *must* mean that he's pirated the product >> is just plain wrong, in my opinion. >> >> On the other hand, in all fairness, a public list is not the place to ask >> this kind of question. > > If I am not mistaken the person who brought it up that he was using pirated > software knew this by examining the headers of the original senders email.
Getting back to whether or not b15 was the GM (golden master) or not -- I have seen b17 and b18 on various "educational" sites. How that factors into the equation, I have no idea. ...and yes, I ordered a copy for myself, too. K -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
