On 11/20/01 9:10 AM, "Greg Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Besides, you are now dodging the point. You are persisting in your straw man
> argument even though it is not pertinent to the facts at hand, and the
> "academic interest" argument you make about my friend's situation is just
> silly. You speculate about facts you know nothing about--and of course you
> only speculate about those that might support your position. You have no
> knowledge of what my associate's level of freedom was to disclose these
> items to me.......do you?
All participants in Microsoft beta programs are subject to NDAs, without
exception. I would be very surprised if reviewers getting betas didn't.
That's also why none of us can answer your original question. we're not
allowed to. Perhaps you find that naive of us. If you're a lawyer, I'm sure
you're accustomed to thinking logically:
Anyone able to answer your question about whether b15 is GM can't do so
because:
1) We signed an NDA preventing us from doing so.
2) We would lose all standing with MS and never get invited back as beta
testers.
Presumably your friend isn't bothered by either of those considerations. So
he won't mind if you tell us his name.
Who's your friend with b15 and GM?
--
Paul Berkowitz
P.S. You could always just glance at the build numbers, you know, and not
ask anyone on this list to do something illegal by telling you...
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
