Since jud is one of the developers at Microsoft, he might well know the terms of the NDA...
If the NDA is well written, it should cover the situation specifically. Since the NDA is a contract, statutes are largely irrelevant, and case law is only marginally relevant. It is the language of the agreement itself that controls, absent ambiguity. But I, too, am getting tired of this debate. You have the right to believe whatever you want. On 11/20/01 6:16 PM, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to clarify: you don't really know if it is a violation or not. You do > not know the contents of the applicable agreement, the circumstances of the > loan, nor the applicable statutory and case law for the jurisdiction. You, > however, do know enough to say that you don't really know. > > on 01.11.20 2:05 PM, jud spencer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Just to clarify this one issue; loaning a computer that contains >> non-disclosed software is a violation of an NDA. > > -- -------- Jim Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hauppauge, NY (Long Island) -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
