NDAs are written by lawyers, not developers :)
On 11/20/01 6:27 PM, "Jim Block" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since jud is one of the developers at Microsoft, he might well know the > terms of the NDA... > > If the NDA is well written, it should cover the situation specifically. > Since the NDA is a contract, statutes are largely irrelevant, and case law > is only marginally relevant. It is the language of the agreement itself that > controls, absent ambiguity. > > But I, too, am getting tired of this debate. You have the right to believe > whatever you want. > > On 11/20/01 6:16 PM, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just to clarify: you don't really know if it is a violation or not. You do >> not know the contents of the applicable agreement, the circumstances of the >> loan, nor the applicable statutory and case law for the jurisdiction. You, >> however, do know enough to say that you don't really know. >> >> on 01.11.20 2:05 PM, jud spencer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >>> Just to clarify this one issue; loaning a computer that contains >>> non-disclosed software is a violation of an NDA. >> >> -- > > -------- > Jim Block > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hauppauge, NY (Long Island) > > > -- Dennis T Cheung dtc (at) pobox.com http://dennistcheung (dot) com -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
