> As to the NDA issue, it is not clear to me that there was any intention to > break confidentiality - nor is it clear to me that a loan of a system would > necessarily constitute a violation of the NDA. We would have to know a lot > more about the circumstances of the loan of the system than has been > presented in this forum to make that judgment, until then, as I recall, the > principle is innocent until proven guilty.
NDA == Nondisclosure agreement. Loaning system with NDA'd software == disclosure Is it possible that there was a corporate NDA. Yes. Was there? No. It's quite possible that it was an innocent mistake; however, that doesn't make it "right". When you sign an NDA, you agree not to disclose the information. Not to "intend not to disclose the information". Innocence has no meaning in this context since we're essentially discussing contract law, not criminal law. All this nonsense aside, it was not clever to ask people to provide this information in a public forum. A tiny bit of thought should have made it clear that you were potentially putting the person who loaned the software at risk. Especially if they inadvertently thereby breached their NDA. mikel -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
