On 1/1/02 4:07 PM, "Adam Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>> What a peculiar idea! Why would you want your signature only on new
>> messages? Oh - I get it. On Windows email clients generally, and Outlook in
>> particular, the default is to reply at the top with enormous strings of the
>> whole previous discussion at the bottom. Why see the signature 17 times?
>> Right.
>> 
>> On the Mac, the tradition is to reply at the bottom by default.
> 
> Most Windows clients do not encourage jeopardy quoting. It is not a Windows
> tradition. It is an Internet tradition. Only one vendor notoriously violates
> that tradition, thankfully.

First and foremost, a huge thank you to Paul for the scripts, they save me a
ton of time. Despite the obvious anti-Microsoft rehtoric in both responses
to my post (which I find ironic on a list dedicated to a MS product), I'd
like to point out a couple reasons why my request makes sense on ANY
platform:

1) Many times the people I write don't need my full signature. I get several
hundred e-mails per day asking me tech questions or responding to something
I wrote. The people who e-mail me will never really need my phone number or
mailing address, so why should I waste space sending it? This is true for
the first message to them as well as subsequent replies, so using key
commands that eliminate extraneous information is a huge time savings.

2) I trade numerous e-mails with co-workers who are already well aware of
who I am and how to reach me, so using "Jake" or "J" is more than sufficient
for a signature.

3) Being able to decide when and where a signature gets added should be a
user's choice, not the software.

-- 
Jake Ludington
Contributing Editor/Radio Show Host

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
877.826.6777

Lockergnome
108 3rd Street
Suite 305A
Des Moines, IA 50309




-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to