> Harry could have accomplished precisely the same thing by running the test > privately and presenting a repeatable, verifiable bug report.
The test was obviously previously run by the 'Entourage Conduit' notification, which aforementioned individuals brushed off. > That would > have been far more useful, and earned him some respect for pointing out a > problem in an intelligent way. Well, I think as much as it would pain you and others to admit to it (and none of you ever will), I made the point, and the desired result was achieved. > Instead, he went for the warhol moment and spammed me, and everyone on the > list. Which, I thought (and as Dan has pointed out) was harmless, and since no harm was achieved, what's the point? If it was indeed harmful, then the argument of those arguing how harmless it is, would be wrong. Gotta love Dan for that brilliance. Anyway, and here's my last words on this subject: - You're all wrong. - MacBU is taking the issue seriously, and will implement some means to plug this whole. - The goal was achieved, so any further argument only services to waste more time and bandwidth, which appears to have a much stronger effect than my demonstration. Have a nice day, Harry -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
