> The fact that Americans allow Nazis to march in their streets is one of many > reasons we *do* have a free country.
A "free" country that, nevertheless, does seem it's okay to tell other countries who to vote for, or who to elect, and when coercion tactics don't work, places that country's *DEMOCRATICALLY* elected President on the Black list? How does that fit into the picture you just painted? (I'm talking about President Kurt Waldheim in the 80s, and J�rg Haider quite recently, of Austria - albeit the 'Nazi' allegations towards President Waldheim have been disproven multiple times, he's still on the Black List and unable to visit the US). A "free" country? > After all the German people have been through in the past > century, they shouldn't have to worry about such things either It's precisely BECAUSE of what they have been through that such laws exist - maybe if America had a similar experience, it would understand, instead of preaching from an armchair. > Having laws against particular points of view is *not* a good thing, Harry. I don't disagree on that point, I do disagree on preaching freedom, but not practicing it. Harry -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
