Welcome to the world after advertising...
OSX is just rreaaaallllyy sloooooow... but ... it doesn't crash...
All that Aqua needs a special processor.. costing extra money... ,just for
the looks imho.
--
Sven-Brussels
GSM: +32 (0)485/389679
EntX-OSX.2.4.Jaguar-IBook-500MHz-640MB SDRAM-14GB HD-Airport-AZERTY Keyboard
CHAT : ICQ UIN: 113835655 - YahooID: aertssven -
AOL Instant Messenger Screen Name: aertssven1 -
MSN Messenger Passport ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For eco-techs & game for a better world, visit:
http://homepage.mac.com/aertssven
-----------
Have a nice day...
On 09-07-2003 20:24, "Jan Martel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of my incredible stupidity, not necessary to detail :-), I'm using
> E'rage 2001 on OS 9 this morning, on an older PowerBook. It is incredibly
> much faster than what I have become used to with E'rage X and OS 10.2.6. I
> guess I had become used to the speed on the other system (faster computer,
> btw), so I didn't think of it as sluggish, but now that I'm back to using
> this for a little while, I realize that my performance on the other is
> really bad. Just little things, like the text appearing on the screen
> significantly after I type it, and deleting a message taking a noticeable
> time, whereas here it just goes away and the next one appears as soon as I
> hit the delete key. So I can't help wondering whether there's something I
> need to do to get the other system to run faster. Or is a certain amount of
> sluggishness the cost of the good things in OSX/Office X?
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
