Thanks.  That's depressing and sad.  I hope that little things like this may
be fixed in a dot release rather than waiting for a major revision.  I'll
submit my feedback via the menu item...




> On 7/22/04 1:36 AM, "Michael J. Kobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>   I'm using the nice new 3-column view in Entourage, but the date shown in
>> the second column is only the received date.  Is there any way to see the
>> date sent, besides resorting to the old browser view or opening the message
>> in a separate window?
> 
> No. Pretty absurd, isn't it? You can still sort by Sent date, you just don't
> see it displayed. Usually you might just see a number of messages all with
> the same (Received) time displayed, when you checked for mail on startup,
> for example, but they will be sorted correctly. Sometimes it's more
> confusing when they appear to be sorted out of order due to a delay in
> transmission.
> 
> If it really matters to you, you'll have to go back to the old
> preview-pane-below view.
> 
> What I find more annoying is that the other line always displays the "From"
> unless the messages are in an officially designated "Sent Items" folder,
> where they will show the "To". But if you have, as I do, some "Sent"
> subfolders for particular accounts, all the names displayed there are my
> name (the "From") even though they're sent messages. Furthermore, Entourage
> actually knows they're sent messages, since for sent messages - including
> these - the Sent time is displayed - there _is_ no Received time for sent
> messages. I would have thought that Entourage would know enough to display
> Sent time for sent messages - but no, only when they're in an official Sent
> Items folder (local or IMAP/server).


-- 
[T]his Court's obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate
its own moral code 


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to