On 8/17/04 12:51 PM, "Lars Schou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 8/17/04 11:33 AM, "John C. Welch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Show me, in a publicly verifiable form, from Microsoft, a promise implied or
>> otherwise that Entourage 2004 would have complete feature parity with
>> Outlook 2003 or even XP.
> 
> Why don't you (or someone from MS) try Mr Franke in Iowa directly to see if
> he would be willing to elaborate on his claim?
> 
> I certainly don't feel obliged to provide a smoking gun to make the point
> that there is a *perception* among some of MS' large Mac customers that
> Entourage 2004 didn't deliver. I don't know that anyone expects or wants
> complete parity (especially not the security part ;) ), but there *are*
> basic pieces of Exchange functionality still missing and it can be
> frustrating not to know if/when they will ever appear.

I don't recall anyone saying that there was a *perception* that Microsoft
claimed Entourage 2004 would achieve parity with Outlook as an Exchange
client. Since perceptions can be totally wrong - and often are - that's
nothing Microsoft can or need reply to. I could say that my perception was
that you promised to stand on your head for 3 hours if you got this wrong.
That doesn't make it true - it just means I mistook my wishful thinking for
the real thing. John is asking for documentation of any such _real_ claim.
There isn't any. They said it would be better than 10.1.4, and it is.
They've said they intend to go on improving it, and they will.

-- 
Paul Berkowitz


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to