I haven't seen that one before. And talk about contemporary, published Oct
2004! Can't get much more current than that (except for tomorrow!).


on 12/15/04 11:36 AM, Allen Watson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> You might want to try the very recent book, "AppleScript: A
> Comprehensive Guide to Scripting and Automation on Mac OS X", by
> Hanaan Rosenthal. It has what, IMO, is the best approach for the
> complete novice, and yet is very thorough.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:46:48 -0800, Eric Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, compared to JavaScript, AppleScript is way more English-like.
>> 
>> There are several books out for AppleScript. Make sure if you buy one that
>> it's only recently been published. For us beginners figuring out what can
>> and can't work with the latest OS X is a major pain. It's amazing Apple
>> hasn't done a better job of promoting AppleScript. Maybe they've always
>> intended to do what Automator is in Tiger?
>> 
>> And I have a PDF from Microsoft on automating Office applications. Not too
>> comprehensive, but useful. And I'm still waiting for my order of 14 months
>> ago at Amazon for the book "AppleScript 1-2-3" the from "father of
>> AppleScript."
>> 
>> 
>> on 12/15/04 6:30 AM, Peter C.S. Adams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>>> Thus spake Paul Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, circa 12/14/2004 8:42 PM:
>>>> tell application "Microsoft Entourage"
>>>>     set include in random of every signature to true
>>> 
>>> I remember when Apple first announced AppleScript, they hailed it as an
>>> "English like" programming language "for the rest of us."
>>> 
>>> Based on examples like the above, I think it's more like a "Yoda like"
>>> language. :->
>>> 
>>> I can always understand a script I see, like the one above, but I can never
>>> make heads or tails of the syntax when I'm trying to write one myself ....
>>> 
>>>     peter
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Eric Welch
>> Carlsbad, CA
>> http://www.jphotog.com
>> 
>> He that is proud of riches is a fool. For if he be exalted above his
>> neighbors because he hath more gold, how much more inferior is he to a gold
>> mine.
>>  - Jeremy Taylor
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> archives:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
>> old-archive:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
>> 
>> 
> 


Eric Welch
Carlsbad, CA
http://www.jphotog.com

Contrary to many peoples' beliefs, a rangefinder camera (of whatever
vintage), is not the invisibility ring from The Hobbit. - Dante Stella


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to