On 19/1/05 9:13 pm, "Michael J. Kobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> If somebody wants to initiate a conversation with me, they are going to have
>> to make it possible, not me. It is an annoyance, one I rank almost as high
>> as those phone calls I get from Mr. PHB's secretary who promptly puts me on
>> hold while she finds Mr PHB and connects us because he wants to talk to me!
> 
> I've said this like a half-dozen times now, but perhaps I haven't been
> clear.  A properly configured TMDA system should add you to the user's white
> list if they send you mail.  If it doesn't, then it's broken.  I agree that
> it's just plain rude to send mail to somebody and then expect that person to
> reply twice.
> 
> --Mike

You have been clear. I don't disagree with what say. However, when I say
"they are going to have to make it possible, not me" I include in that
statement having their anti-spam system set up correctly to facilitate it. A
TMDA system that is properly set up would be undetectable to recipients of
such messages, and so should not be causing any issues. Unfortunately, there
are quite a few people out their with incorrectly configured systems who do
send out challenges to correspondents replying to a first approach. This is
the problem that people here are objecting to, not TMDA in general.

-- 
Barry Wainwright
Microsoft MVP (see http://mvp.support.microsoft.com for details)
Seen the All-New Entourage Help Pages? - Check them out:
        <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/>


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to