Joe-
Another classic forestry maxim is that the clearcut has the advantage of a 
single entry over a long period of time.
I was wondering if in your experience with multiple entry forestry, if that 
advantage is all that it's heralded to be?
To be more specific, what kinds of consideration do you give to haul road 
locations, knowing that there will be subsequent entries?
-don

Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:54:05 -0500
From: [email protected]
Subject: [ENTS] Re: Atlantic white cedar
To: [email protected]










I consider that article to 
be classic forestry propaganda. It used to be that the wood industry would say, 
"we must cut the timber for a growing economy". Now, they wised up and tell 
people, "we must cut the timber because doing so is fabulous ecological work- 
and in fact, the very best way to do it is to clearcut it- this species must be 
clearcut". No, it doesn't say that in the article, but I know how to read 
between the lines. They need to destroy it to save it. Clearcut it to save it. 
This brilliant eco presentation so common across the country has convinced 
countless naive people, including leaders of many major enviro groups. Yuh, 
doesn't this stand look much better now that it's been clearcut to regenerate 
it?
 
Of course somebody could 
say, why regenerate it? Is it really, really, really necessary to clearcut it 
in 
order to harvest some of it over an extended period? Many species are said to 
be 
clearcut dependent- then we find out later, that's not true- such as a fellow 
named  Wilkinson out west who has managed his own Doug  Fir forest for 
several decades without clearcutting. Here in the Northeast, we're told we need 
to clearcut red oak- which is a big fat lie. We are also told we need to 
clearcut red pine in Massachusetts because it's not native- another big fat 
lie, 
not only is it native, it doesn't need clearcutting. And, we're told that we 
must clearcut Norway spruce to rid the state of this vile foreign species, yes, 
the state actually wrote "foreign species" in one of its recent 
brochures.
 
I say never believe anyone 
who works for the wood industry without a great deal of research.
 
Ed., I like your skepticism 
regarding the state of NJ. If NJ is anything like the state of Mass.- don't 
believe a word they say. I also like your skepticism of green certification- 
which is without a doubt a huge scam designed to fool naive folks that 
rapacious 
logging is a wonderful thing. Amazing!
 
Joe

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Edward 
  Frank 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:06 
  PM
  Subject: [ENTS] Re: Atlantic white 
  cedar
  

  Russ,
   
  Thank you for posting the link. It is 
  an interesting and informative article.  It is written from a forest 
  management perspective and is strongly anti-preservationist.  There is 
  nothing wrong with that.  Different people have different 
  perspectives.  The main argument is that with proper management 
  harvesting the white cedar forests would pay for their own 
  preservation and protect their future as a timber producing 
  species.  I am sure that is correct as far as an economic 
  analysis goes.  
   
  My big concern is whether or not 
  proper forest management would prevail, when the profits are short term and 
  management would require a long term commitment.  
   
  I know in the coal strip mining 
  industry in PA, this often was not the case.  The operators would be 
  required to post a "reclamation" bond designed to assure the land surface 
  would be restored after mining. The bond was typically a lesser amount than 
  was actually needed to reclaim the surface, in particular when through poor 
  practices acid mine drainage was created.  Treatment of AMD required a 
  long term commitment of money.  Many times, over and over again, a mining 
  company would dissolve after mining an area and forfeit its bond, because it 
  was cheaper to do that than pay for restoration.  Then in the next mining 
  application the same people would be running a new coal company with 
different 
  name and slightly altered organizational structure.  Since this 
  was different new company their application could not be denied based 
  upon past performance, since legally they did not have any bad past 
  performance history.
   
  If the area of white cedar forests 
  are limited, my concern is that they would be cut, and the operators would 
  bail before spending the money to do the proper replanting and maintenance to 
  assure regeneration of the cedar forest.  In the authors opinion"The 
  New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and 
  Forestry, has been forward thinking with regards to the Atlantic white cedar 
  resource."  I am not sure what that means - are they really doing a good 
  job and are forward thinking, or are they simply lapdogs for the forest 
  industry? 
   
  The article states there is a 
  best management practices manual for logging Atlantic white cedar.  I 
  would like to see an evaluation of the manual by an independent reviewer who 
  could judge whether it is a good plan or a gift to the forest industry by 
  their political buddies.  I am in favor of developing partnerships 
  between industry and government that allows profit to the forestry industry 
  and sustains the resource.  I also want to be assured that some of 
  the forests will be preserved unaltered for use by the general public and for 
  future generation, and not given away for a quick one time 
  profit.  
   
  I know there are good people in 
  the forestry industry striving to do a good job, but so many areas have 
  been ravaged by unscrupulous people out for a quick buck, that I must 
  question veracity of these types of plans.  Green certification for 
  example, seems often to just mean a "green" light for the loggers to do 
  whatever they want.  What enforceable assurances are there, that even if 
  these best management plans are good, that they will actually be 
  followed?  
   
  Ed   
  
   
  Join me at the Primal Forests - Ancient Trees Community at:  
http://primalforests.ning.com/ 

  
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: 
    [email protected] 
    To: [email protected] 
    
    Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:03 
    PM
    Subject: [ENTS] Atlantic white 
    cedar
    

    ENTS:
     
    There has been some discussion on Atlantic white cedar in past 
    posts.
     
    I just came across a recent article on the trees and thought some might 
    find it interesting.  
     
    The article is a pdf document and can be accessed at 
https://www.sawmillmag.com/index.php
     
    Russ Richardson



    
    
    Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage 
    from the nation's 
    capital.<BR<BR




_________________________________________________________________
Windows Liveā„¢: Keep your life in sync. 
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org

You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to