Bill, 



     I am aware that a number of my friends and associates have asked that I be 
allowed to make a presentation to the Technical Steering Committe of the Forest 
Futures Visioning Process to share with committee mem bers specific knowledge 
and experience I have with Massachusetts forests. I would be most pleased to do 
that. If a presentation by me is desired, I would propose to discuss the 
following topics. 



    1. A criteria for identifying exceptional Massachusetts forest sites for 
recognition and protection . 



    2. A review of the administrative apparatus used by other states to 
identify, evaluate, nominate, select, and protect exceptional forest sites. 



    3. A review of exceptional forest sites in Massachusetts based on the 
criteria in #1 above. 



    4. A review of exceptional forest sites in other states and how they 
compare with sites in Massachusetts . 



    I know that some of my friends had wanted me to serve on the Technical 
Steering Committee, but I elected not to make myself available for two primary 
reasons. The biggest one at the time was my health. I was experiencing serious 
problems and simply did not have the energy to devote to additional 
projects. I'm happy to report that the health issues are favorably settled for 
the time being. The other reason for not making myself available is that I can 
be better utilized in another capacity. I've alluded to that in previous 
emails. 

    As the co-founder and Executive Director of the Eastern Native Tree Society 
(ENTS), I have behind me an organization that has great research depth in areas 
that have not been developed in other organizations within Massachusetts - even 
the most prestigi ous academic and environmental ones . Given the 
erudite status of Massachusetts academic institutions, this is a bold assertion 
to make, but it can be backed up. Consequently, I believe that my time is best 
utilized for the greater good when I am working in the ENTS specialty areas. 
Others with good legal minds will do a far better job of figuring out how best 
to protect valued forest sites - once they know where the sites are and what 
makes them valuable. In addition, i t is critically important to have 
sufficient information about each site  to enable a prioritization of the sites 
. If choices must be made, let's make the right ones. But t o be able to do 
this requires hig hly specialized knowledge that accrues as much  from one's 
passions as professional status. In ENTS, there is no shortage of either. We 
understand how to evaluate forest sites in a comparative manner 
when comparisons becomes necessary. 

    At the least, w e need a system in Massachusetts as effective as what I 
observed in states like Indiana and Ohio - states  that are largely 
agricultural. Scarcity of inspiring woodlands in those states served to 
motivate  them to achieve a higher level of forest cognizance. They 
successfully combined historical, ecological, and aesthetic perspectives. As a 
result , t hey now recognize and protect forest sites of exceptional value 
through their implemented nature preserve programs .     

    T o establish a system of comparable efficacy in Massachusetts, we need 
input from people experienced at determining what makes forest sites 
sufficiently unique or special to justify protection. We need people who have 
not only thought through concepts of  forest value along largely non-economic 
lines, but people who spend the bulk of their time in the field evaluating 
sites . Expertise in how to construct criteria for evaluating forest sites 
along non-economic lines is what ENTS specifically brings to the table in 
spades and that expertise ca n be mad e available to the Committee for the 
asking. 

    As a final bit of information to illustrate my point, I have just returned 
from an extended trip to the Rocky Mountain West that includes   a 
connection with the huge San Juan National Forest in colorful Colorado. We will 
likely hold a joint conference next year on western old growth forests: the 
science, management and restoration, and values. Participants will be ENTS and 
WNTS (Western Native Tree Society), the Forest Service, the Bureau of 
Reclamation, and Fort Lewis College in Durango. I think I can state confidently 
that t hese last three organizations would not commit time to such a joint 
venture unless there was a clear value to each participant. I'd like to think 
that t he basis for t hat value was established during my visit. 

    I am ready to place the expertise of ENTS at the disposal of the Steering 
Committee toward the agenda outlined above . Bill, t he ball is now in your 
court.   



Best wishes, 



Bob  Leverett 



President, Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest 

Cofounder and Executive Director, Eastern Native Tree Society   

Member, Western Native Tree Society    




 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to