Bob:

I recognized that the beach photo was from the Porcupine Mountains 
before I even read your caption. What I can't figure out is how I knew 
thats where it was. 11,000 year old wood from buried forests sometimes 
washes up on that beach. I assume that you radio carbon dated each piece 
of wood before throwing it on the fire to avoid burning priceless fossils.

Lee


[email protected] wrote:
> Marc,
>
> You are a kindred spirit. Yes, Maine's Katahdin is remindful of 
> western summits. It has an impressive cliff face, exhibits compelling 
> contours that compel the eye to follow its long profile, and it rises 
> high above its base. One has to see this mountain to fully appreciate 
> it. And of primary interest to Ents, Katahdin has first-growth forest 
> on its upper slopes. The individual trees may not be that old, but the 
> forest is not re-growth from logging. Katahdin is a national treasure.
>
> Speaking of great views, there is a vista that takes my breath away in 
> the Great Smoky Mountains of eastern Tennessee. One encounters the 
> view at the northern end of the Foothills Parkway. From an overlook, 
> the scene opens toward the massive forms of 6,621-foot Mount Guyot, 
> 6,417-foot Mount Chapman, 6,370-foot Old Black, and 9 other 
> 6,000-footers that comprise the crest of the Smokies. People who stop 
> at the overlook and snap shots seldom realize that they are looking at 
> a 4,000 to 5,000-foot wall of mountains rising before them -- a 
> Western-magnitude landscape. 
>
> In pure vertical relief, the western slopes of the Smokies rank #1 
> among eastern mountains, with Mount Leconte often cited as rising 
> 5,301 feet above its "base" in Gatlinburg, a base that I fear is 
> laterally placed a little too far away. Still, we can squeeze a 
> 5,000-foot base-to-summit rise out of Leconte by choosing the right 
> approach to it.
>
> Back to the big view mentioned above. For the mountain-attuned, what 
> diminishes awareness of the size of this view of the Smokies? The lush 
> vegetation and characteristic blue haze softens the impact (and other 
> prominent eastern summits). The dense covering of trees on the slopes 
> and summits along with the almost perpetual blue haze makes them look 
> softer, friendlier. Clouds often enshroud the summits where annual 
> precipitation regularly exceeds 80 inches and can go over 100 in wet 
> years. Rising morning mists lend an almost tropical look to the Smokies. 
>
> But once in their embrace, the wildness, vastness, and sheer size of 
> the Smokies become apparent. Will Blozan once made a trek to measure a 
> tree far off the trail network. By the time he had returned from the 
> tree to his vehicle, he had put on a whopping 7,500 feet of elevation 
> changes. What motivated him to expend so much energy? Real forest 
> giants grow hidden in the deep ravines and coves. There are almost 
> 150,000 acres of original growth forest in the Smokies, and despite 
> the countless hours expended by Will and Jess Riddle, they keep 
> finding more huge trees and new champions of height. Their discoveries 
> and the finds of others have made us aware that the temperate 
> rainforest environment of the slopes and summits of the Smokies 
> supports the greatest deciduous-coniferous forest in the East. We have 
> documented more species of trees in the Smokies that reach significant 
> size and/or height than for any other eastern forest. Many of our tall 
> tree lists reflect the pre-eminence of the Smokies.
>
> When I returned from the Far East and southeastern Asia in 1971, where 
> I had been, courtesy of the USAF, the Smokies were most remindful to 
> me of the tropical mountains I had found so attractive in the 
> Philippines and on Taiwan. I had always loved the Smokies, but as a 
> consequence of my time in Asia, I acquired a new appreciation for 
> them. In fact, my Asian experiences and southern Appalachian 
> reconnections were key motivators in the co-founding of ENTS.  
>
> I have always thought the Appalachians to be far richer in viewscapes 
> than they are given credit by western mountain aficionados. I'm with 
> James Robert Smith in his disdain for any who would disparage the 
> Appalachians as mere hills. They are mountains. My experience as a 
> numerical comparer and contraster has reinforced that awareness. It 
> has also allowed me to acquire some measurement benchmarks. For my 
> particular eye, it takes about a half mile of vertical relief, gained 
> fairly quickly, to create a real mountain look. Thereafter, visual 
> impressiveness does expand as vertical relief increases, but a point 
> is reached where my eye-brain combination just can't calibrate what it 
> is being fed. Beyond that point, more is not better, at least not a 
> lot better. Well, uh, let me rethink what I've just said as I 
> contemplate the visual impact of Denali up Don Bertolette's way. Hmmm, 
> maybe there are other exceptions as well. Colorado's San Juans or 
> Wyoming's Grand Tetons anyone? 
>
> I'll conclude this across-the-summits ramble with 3 images taken last 
> summer on the third of Monica's and my fabulous western adventures. 
> The first image shows our restful spot on the southern shore of Lake 
> Superior, a spot near the entrance to Porcupine Mountain State Park - 
> Lee's old stomping grounds. Lake Superior is a first-class spiritual 
> experience. In terms of the image, I'm unsure of the whether the chair 
> on the left side adds or detracts. Maybe it is a metaphor or symbol 
> for something. My aching bones? 
>
> The last two images are of Wyoming's incomparable Grand Tetons. The 
> first image looks across sage brush flats to the ever-dominant profile 
> of the Grand. That 13,770-foot mass of rock and ice is the second 
> highest summit in Wyoming. At 13,804 feet, only Gannett Peak is 
> loftier, but the Grand is more dramatic. It boldly thrusts its weather 
> resistant rock nearly 7,000 feet above Jackson Hole. Eye-popping. 
> However, in fairness to Gannett, the comparisons are not over (they 
> never are). The slopes of Gannett Peak are home to the largest of the 
> glaciers within that portion of the Rocky Mountain chain located in 
> the lower 48 states. Yes, there are much larger glaciers in the 
> Cascades and on those huge Pacific volcanoes such as Rainier. 
> Comparisons. Comparisons. Comparisons.  
>
> The second image looks across Jenny Lake toward the Grand and other 
> high peaks of the Tetons. 
>
> Bob
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcboston" <[email protected]>
> To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:29:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Eastern and western summits
>
>
> Aside from the "Knife Edge" I have to say that the "Hunt Trail" was my
> favorite.  I really enjoyed the large rolling plateau and alpine
> vegatation,  made for a very nice walk after ascending for the first
> part of the day.  The steep parts of the Hunt trail were gorgeous and
> though not as exposed as Paloma or the Knife Edge still exciting.
> When I get a chance I will upload some shots.  I toted my large DSLR
> camera up with me along with a 10-20mm lense.  I just need to reduce
> the images,  they are way to large to upload on here.  Bob,  dont you
> think the mountain rings of something you might see in the Cascades?
> Obviously not as arid as California or Colorado.  Mike,  I think I sat
> down on the same area where you wife is sitting .  My wife freaked out
> one me when she checked out my pictures!
>
>
> On Jul 29, 6:22 am, "Mike Leonard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Two more shots of Katahdin:
> >
> > Knife Edge overview.
> > The End. The sign for the Big K looks a bit battered just like we were
> > at the end of the hike! We met a couple who had just finished the 2,000
> > mile AT and they were poppin' the cork!
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >
> > Behalf Of JamesRobertSmith
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:11 PM
> > To: ENTSTrees
> > Subject: [ENTS] Re: Eastern and western summits
> >
> > Katahdin is my all-time favorite eastern peak. And I've hiked a bunch
> > of them. The only major eastern mountain ranges I've never set foot in
> > are the Catskills and Adirondacks. And the Daks are very high on my
> > list to someday hike. If I can just get around to doing it before I
> > get too old.
> >
> > I hiked Katahdin a few years ago. I've hiked pretty much all of the
> > major southern peaks (with a few exceptions) and several of the big
> > peaks in New Hampshire (including Mount Washington). But Katahdin is
> > king, in my estimation. Yes, there are higher peaks, but it holds its
> > own in pure relief against many other major eastern mountains, plus it
> > is so isolated. We did a killer hike:
> >
> > Entrance to Chimney Pond. Cathedral Trail to Baxter Peak. Knife's Edge
> > to Helon Taylor. Helon Taylor back to the Chimney Pond Trial and out
> > to our car.
> >
> > My thigh muscles screamed for two days.
> >
> > On Jul 28, 4:08 pm, Marcboston <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Bob,  I really enjoy your mountain submissions!    I just got back ( 2
> > > weeks ago) from Baxter State Park.  Katahdin is one truly great east
> > > coast mountain,  not sure if you have been up there but it worth the
> > > trip.  Though smaller than Washington it is a world apart.  I found it
> > > to be a tougher climb and much more "frontier" like.  A very steep
> > > mountain with a superb alpine zone.   The knife edge is unlike
> > > anything I have seen here in New England.
> >
> > > On Jul 28, 12:09 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > > ENTS,
> >
> > > > Oops! My statement, " The second and fourth images show eastern
> > mountain scenes." obviously was meant to be western mountain scenes.
> > Alas, as dementia sets in, I make more and more of these goofs.
> >
> > > > Bob
> >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > To: [email protected], [email protected], "Sarah
> > Belchetz-Swenson" <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > Cc: "Paul Dittmer" <[email protected]>, "Carol Gilmour"
> > <[email protected]>, "Sharl Heller" <[email protected]>, "Claudia
> > Hurley" <[email protected]>, "Amy Kaiser"
> > <[email protected]>, "Rob Loomis" <[email protected]>, "Rod
> > MacIver" <[email protected]>, "Mike Ryan" <[email protected]>,
> > "Eleanor Tillinghast" <[email protected]>, "Joseph Zorzin"
> > <[email protected]>, "Doug Seale" <[email protected]>, "Nancy
> > Weiss" <[email protected]>, "Phoebe Weil" <[email protected]>,
> > "David Stahle" <[email protected]>, "celeste rounkles"
> > <[email protected]>, "Denis Jakuc" <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:58:11 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > > > Subject: [ENTS] Eastern and western summits
> >
> > > > ENTS,
> >
> > > > I'm convinced that I was born under a curse. I'm sentenced to
> > compulsively make numerical contrasts and comparisons. And with no false
> > modesty, I am damned good at it. Where others stumble, I see the
> > quantitative nuances. For me, rounding off numbers, unless absolutely
> > necessary, is a vulgar practice.
> > > > I am not alone in my talent. Lee Frelich and Will Blozan are equally
> > gifted. Lee would never, say, round the number 1,047 by substituting the
> > vague descriptor "thousands" as newspaper reports frequently do. I guess
> > reporters think that in introducing imprecision they are capturing the
> > essence of an idea. Hogwash!
> > > > Well, I'm expanding my comparative talents with the camera. I don't
> > yet know what I'm doing, but it feels right. When I attempt to describe
> > the boldness of the western landscape in words, it can sound as if I'm
> > diminishing its eastern equivalent. Not so. At least, not necessarily.
> > However, east and west are qualitatively and quantitatively different,
> > and where in the past I've concentrated strictly on numerical measures,
> > I have now added the camera's all seeing eye.
> > > > The first and third of the three attached images show eastern
> > mountain panoramas. The second and fourth images show eastern mountain
> > scenes. The vertical relief in these images is approximately the same.
> > Does it look the same to the eye? BTW, a spin off talent of this
> > cultivated perception is quickly judging the heights of trees.
> > > > As a general observation, western mountain panoramic scenes are
> > usually painted from a broader color pallet. Land shapes are more
> > angular. Outlines are sharper. The blue haze of the Appalachians softens
> > features and can diminish the appearance of significant size. The
> > eastern Catskills are mountains - not just big hills.
> > > > The vegetative covering of western mountains is heavily skewed
> > toward conifers,; that of the eastern peaks toward hardwoods. Neither is
> > better than the other, just different. Viva la difference.
> >
> > > > Bob- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> >
> >
> >  IMG_1143.JPG
> > 927KViewDownload
> >
> >  IMG_1151.JPG
> > 800KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to