Mike,
Greylock does have fine stands of the species mentioned. Also, the geology is topsy turvy on Greylock with older rocks overriding younger ones. Lots to hold one's interest beyond the compelling views. Ed, To answer your question on ages of the red spruce, the oldest ones we have dated are slightly over 400 years. Others are in the 250 range. Still others are in the 150 to 200. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Leonard" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: "tanya blaich" <[email protected]>, "\"Paul\"\" \"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "\"John\"\" \"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, \"[email protected], "Dave\"\" <[email protected]>, \"[email protected], \"Sharl\"" <[email protected]>, "\"Claudia\"\" \"[email protected]" <mandchur...@comcast> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2009 6:53:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [ENTS] Re: More Greylock Bob, In the late 80 ’ s using the 50 Hikes in MA book I hiked Mt. Greylock via the Hopper Trail, Money Brook Trail to Mt. Prospect – Mt. Williams – Mt. Fitch to Greylock. Looking at the notes in my old book I noted that it was the finest stand of northern hardwoods, red spruce, and hemlock I had ever seen in MA. What about the new “ face ” on Grey lock as a result of the 1990 landslide? See http://www.flickr.com/photos/oweinh/1078357344/ Has the old Indian Chief revealed himself? Mike -----Original Message----- From : [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:31 PM To: [email protected] Cc: tanya blaich, \"Dittmer, Paul\" <[email protected]>, \"Davis, John\" <jdavis@ adirondackcouncil.org>, <\"Gafney, Dave\" <www.gafneyphoto.com>>, \"Heller, Sharl\" <[email protected]>, \"Hurley, Claudia\" <mandchur...@comcast. Subject: [ENTS] More Greylock ENTS, Saturday's trek into Mount Greylock's Hopper is still reverberating with me. The loss of the champion red spruce is not a small matter, but thinking about the many charms of Mount Greylock's hidden corners diminishes the feeling of irreplaceable loss. Lee ' s reminder of the unfinished forest role of that wonderful old spruce also helps. Hopefully, the four attached images reveal a little more of the Greylock magic. Monica and I will return in cooler weather and my documentation mission will continue. I ha ve become obsessed with documenting the great trees and the viewscapes while we still have them. Image #1: This image shows more of the Hopper forest. If it looks secluded in the image, that is how it feels when there. Small groves of mature hemlocks su rrounded by maple, birch, beech, cherry, ash, and oak call to mind the complex mix of disturbances that characterize these lovely woods. The Hopper has been visited by both human caused and natural disturbances. No news there, but the protection given by t he Hopper speeds up the forces of regeneration. Image #2: This image looks back into the Hopper from near the trailhead. The ridge with the steep shoulder on the right is Greylock. There are several possible origins for the name Greylock. One is of In dian origin. Greylock was a Native American from a Woronoco village in what is now the Russell, MA area. Another source for the name suggests that the frost and ice often seen on the upper slopes gives the peak a gray beard or "lock". Image #3: The Hop per is steep. Over the millennia, rocks break off ledges above and slowly slide down the mountain, eventually coming to rest in gentler terrain. I can't guarantee this to be the explanation for the lone rock in this image, but the boulder isn't a glacial e rratic. It is part of Greylock's bedrock. Image #4: In the aftermath of all the rain, Hopper Brook was roaring. The image speaks for itself. I checked my records and found that the large white ash shown in the previous email, i.e. Tanya's Tree, was 1 16.8 feet in height the last time I measured it, which would have been about 4 years ago. My Saturday measurement was 117.7 feet - not 117.5 as I reported. The tree's girth then is shown in my records as 10.5 feet for no gain in 4 years. However, I can't b e sure that I measured the tree from the same spot. My guess is that it would have grown in girth at most 0.1 feet. Bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
