Mike That tree is barely 150 years old. First, they are measuring too high. With such low branching it should be measured at the narrowest point below 4.5 feet (don't know how many centimeters that is, sorry) It is obviously multiple trunks at a low height, so it is unlikely that the tree is old at all. It is only 16.9 feet in cbh. I know a 167cm dia. sounds bigger, but that is all it is. My other question is why the hell are they wearing safety vests?!? I knew liability would come to this sooner or later. Now we have to wear safety vests just to walk around. What's next flashing light hardhats for everyone? Poking fun here.
Scott --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
