Time, 

I don't name pines after myself. There is no Leverett pine that I know of. So, 
I'm assuming you mean the pine in the Trees of Peace that we added to the 150 
list. Is that the one you mean? 


Bob 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy Zelazo" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2009 5:38:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [ENTS] Day at a time 

Bob: 

What one is the Leverett pine? I haven't been sending any photos that possibly 
could be used in the exhibit but I enjoyed the Trees of Peace and the mast area 
yesterday. I didn't plan on taking photos because the light wasn't good but 
since you were working me so hard, I needed an excuse to break away. 

Tim 


On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM, < [email protected] > wrote: 




Tim, 


The new 150 for the Trees of Peace has a tag number of 50. The tree directly 
behind the Trees of Peace sign named the Plaque Pine has tag number 85. I'll be 
sending you an updated spreadsheet soon that will have the new tree. 


That's a superb image of Jake. It shows Jake's height better than any other 
image I've seen. Good job. 


Bob 






----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy Zelazo" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2009 4:41:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [ENTS] Day at a time 




Bob: 

What was the tag # on the Leverett tree near the tree of peace sign? 

Tim 




On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:00 PM, < [email protected] > wrote: 






ENTS, 


Today DCR District Manager and member of the ENTS list Tim Zelazo and I visited 
a small area in MTSF that we call the mast pines. It's part of the region 
officially designated as the Trees of Peace . Our mission was to locate and 
measure the remaining 150-footers among the mast pines. The task of measuring 
the mast pines is easier now that they are tagged, thanks to Ent Lisa Bozzuto. 


I confirmed four 150-footers among the mast pines yesterday. From measuring 
mast pines in the past, before they were tagged, I knew there was at least two 
more 150-footers, but I had lost track of them. It was time to relocate the 
candidates and record their tag numbers. 


By the time we finished measuring, we had indeed confirmed the 5th and 6th 
150-footers in the mast pine area. However, we earned ourselves a bonus. We 
also confirmed a new 150 within the main area of the Trees of Peace - close to 
the Trees of Peace sign. Well, it wasn't always a 150. Regardless, that makes 
20 for the main area. And there may be one more in the mast pines. The pines 
are crowded and it is difficult to get clear shots of their tops. One can 
easily spend 15 or 20 minutes or longer on one tree. 


Before we entered the mast pine area, we focused our attention on a particular 
tree in the Cherokee-Choctaw pines. I had spent a good 35 minutes on it 
yesterday, ending up with 149.3 feet. Nothing changed today. I got 149.3 feet 
today. Next year, it should enter the 150 Club. 


It was especially good to have an official from DCR join me. Tim is assessing 
the individual pine groves and trees within Mohawk, which can be showcased, 
which should remain anonymous. His willingness to do this is gratifying for me. 
It validates the value of the data ENTS has been gathering. 


So where do we stand? At this point the make up of the Mohawk 150 Club and 
potential for growth is as follows. 



        Area    # 150s Measured in past         # Potential 150s        # 150s 
remeasured in 2009       Tallest in area-as of last measurement 
                                        
        Trout Brook     2       2       1       152.3 


        Pocumtuck       12      13      0       153.3 


        Cherokee-Choctaw        3       3       1       152.5 


        
ENTS    18      19      1       161.2 
        Trees of Peace  20      20      20      169.3 
        
Mast area       6       7       6       156.3 
        
Algonquin       12      12      6       162.0 
        
Elders  9       9       5       165.6 
        
Shunpike        4       4       3       158.8 
                                        
        Total   86      89      43              
        
        
        







Is there any real value to tracking the tall white pines of Mohawk in such a 
detailed fashion? Measuring and re-measuring them? Naming them? Others will 
have to render judgment. I have reasons for doing it, but am clearly biased. 


Bob 








-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] 



-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] 





-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] 



-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] 

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to