Dan,

I love your reports on the Smokies. They are a wonderful place. I
gotta get back in there.

James P.

On Jan 6, 6:28 pm, ranger dan <[email protected]> wrote:
> ENTS-
>
> Over the holidays, I spent a week exploring in the Smokies, and I
> thought I might share some of my findings with you.  The most
> rewarding day for finding ancient trees was spent crosscountry (off-
> trail) in the Forge Creek drainage, near Cades Cove.  I will post some
> images if someone will enlighten me on how to reduce my 800mb images
> to 400mb or smaller so I can send them.
>
> Up the Forge Creek trail about a mile, you come to the obvious
> beginning of virgin forest (I use the term to mean never-logged,
> regardless of age of trees or fire history), where you pass through
> flanking old white oaks like a gate into the wonderland of big trees.
> To the left of the trail is a 15'cbh chestnut snag that must be at
> least 50' tall, with hollows where limbs were, and a rapid taper.
> Seems all chestnuts were that way, from the logs and snags I've seen,
> and this one's the largest of any I've seen in more than 30 years of
> exploring.  The tuliptrees ahead are much more impressive than I think
> the chestnuts could have been.  The first ones are just ahead.  The
> largest here I measured at 18'cbh a few years ago...it's just upslope
> from the trail, and it's hollow.  There are a few big hemlocks here,
> all dead, with limbs starting to fall.  The largest of them is between
> 3 and 4'dbh, like almost everywhere else.  Any bigger than that is
> extremely rare.  I've never seen one as big as 5', though I know they
> are out there.  There are a few smaller still-living ones, no doubt
> saved by the efforts of those who care.  I was saddened to see that
> some of the big ones farther up the trail had been treated (Will, I'm
> sure you can tell us the details), as there were paint spots at the
> bases, but all were dead.
>
> Just across the creek is the confluence of Licklog Branch.
> Disappointment at first...no big trees along the creek or on the
> slopes above for a long way.  There has been a lot of hot fire in the
> Cades Cove area in the not-so-distant past, leaving slopes like the
> south-facing one here devoid of old trees, and with sterile soil.
> Yellow pines here have been wiped out recently by pine bark beetles,
> leaving a few, scattered small chestnut oaks.  Even the north-facing
> slope is younger, hemlock forest...yes, mostly dead.  A few cling to
> life still, and fewer still seem to have some resistance to the
> adelgids, but always the smaller ones.  As always under hemlock and
> often elsewhere, is a tangle of Rhododendron maximum, scourge of the
> crosscountry explorer.  Many curses!!
>
> Things change beyond.  I crawled up out of the damn rhodo into clear,
> open forest.  Where the valley turns southward, I started up Molly's
> Butt.  Yep, that's what it's called.  Up one side and down the other I
> went.  The west-facing side of the ridge is chestnut oak-dominated.
> Many look to be 200-300 years old, 30-36"dbh, with a few old
> tuliptrees as large.  They don't get very big on these hot slopes.
> There's an understory of huckleberry.
>
> Then things started getting good.  On the east-facing slope above, the
> understory of Kalmia opens up into a steep little cove, just below the
> ridge, where the first giants live.  There's a hollow tuliptree 17'cbh
> that you can go inside, surrounded by some lesser but still impressive
> and very old cohorts.  I love to examine the crowns of old
> tuliptrees...every one a unique sculpture of stout, shapely limbs,
> hollows, and neat details.  A short distance up the ridge, in high
> coves at the foot of Molly's Butt, lies a paradise of clear, open
> ground on lush soil (probably full of spring wildflowers like
> Trilliums) which nurtures huge tuliptrees, northern red oaks, and
> black cherries.  I was having a photographic frenzy while trying to
> measure some of the biggies and leave time to get back down before
> dark.  The guardian of the grove was another 17' tuliptree.  One about
> as large had recently fallen by the trunks of 2 more giants, creating
> a spectacle of the megaflora.  Several are over 5'dbh, many over 3'.
> A few oaks are around 4', and a coulpe cherries nearly 4'.  No
> hemlocks to grieve over.  There's more spectacular forest on this
> north side of Molly's Butt than I had time to see, but there was more
> on the way down.
>
> Even the south-facing slope leading down to Ekaneetlee Branch has some
> large tuliptrees in coves.  Where I met the creek, there are giants
> upstream, ones to see some other time.  There are hemlocks along it,
> and on the north slope, but few, and none very large.  The rhodo isn't
> as thick here, either, and there is clear ground above.  A fallen 5'
> thick tuliptree log spans the creek, making for an amazing footlog and
> vantage point for viewing standing trees as large and larger nearby.
> Far upslope, I measured the largest of the day at 19', an open-sided
> tulip with charcoal on the exposed heartwood of the uphill side.
> There is a lot of fire scarring on the larger trees in the Cades Cove
> area (and in Joyce Kilmer and plenty of other places, incidentally).
> This one stands in an open grove that extends up to the ridge top and
> probably to the gentler slopes surrounding.  But it was getting dark.
> Down into the rhodo again to cross the creek.
>
> Helluva challenge but I gotta do it while I can and before the fallen
> hemlocks make it even more challenging.  I guess there will be lots of
> good footlogs coming, though.  Can't wait to get back.
>
> Dan Miles

Reply via email to