Gaines, 

Will Blozan climbed the 167-footer I think and got some phenomenal footage of 
the climb. I remember him describing one incredible limb of the loblolly as 
something around 80 feet in length. Maybe I'm dreaming, but I seem to recall 
that.No white pine I know of will hold onto a limb of that length. 


Bob 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gaines McMartin" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 1:18:53 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [ENTS] Re: White pine growth rates--something of interest about 
growth possibilities 

Bob: 

I see--a little over 167. Impressive! 

--Gaines 
----------------------------------------------- 
On 1/8/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Gaines, 
> 
> 
> If you research the height of loblollies in the ENTS material, you'll find 
> that we've found a few taller ones. 
> 
> 
> Bob 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gaines McMartin" <[email protected]> 
> To: [email protected] 
> Cc: [email protected] 
> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 12:08:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Re: White pine growth rates--something of interest about 
> growth possibilities 
> 
> Larry: 
> 
> Loblolly pines--wondeful trees. Actually they can grow faster than 
> you think. On the best sires they can grow to 120 feet in 50 years 
> (average is 90 feet). At 70 years they can be 132 feet tall. But 
> growth declines rapidly and they are not especially long lived--not 
> nearly as long lived as white pine. The tallest loblolly pine that I 
> have heard about is 162 feet tall. I seriously doubt any loblolly 
> pine could reach or has ever reached 200 feet. 
> 
> --Gaines 
> 
> On 1/8/10, Larry <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> ENTS, Not to change to other pines, but down south, loblolly, slash, 
>> spruce, shortleaf can reach 120' heights in 85 years. I think the some 
>> of the tallest pines in the US may have been some loblolly, in the 
>> deep south. We may never know, they all were cut down by the greedy 
>> timber companies long ago! They could have very well reached 200'! 
>> Larry 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to