Ed:

Some trees growing in harsh conditions are genetically dwarfed. Over many generation, random mutations and gene recombinations lead to loss of genes necessary to grow tall, and although such individuals would be selected against in a population on a typical site where tall growth was possible, on a rocky site the lost genes are never missed, and those individuals pass them on. There is probably also some selection against genes necessary to grow tall, because it would not be efficient to try to grow tall, and perhaps such individuals have higher mortality rates, due to drought stress, rime ice, etc.

Lee

Edward Frank wrote:
Larry, Barry,
My last response comes across harsher than I intended. There are likely other reasons besides fire contributing to the poor soils in the pine barrens. Pitch Pine is able to grown in these poorer soil conditions. What I was trying to do was to consider the role of fire in the barrens. With other factors seeming similar and the age of the most stunted trees similar to those in the surrounding area, I was arguing that the intensity of fire was the cause for the more severe stunting. Marion Brooks is an example of the effects of severe fire on a standard forest system and the results are similar to what is being exhibited here, both in terms of the different degrees of stunting of trees in different areas and the paucity of species diversity. The Marion Brooks fires were the result of the aftermath of logging operations. It could be wrong but I still think that given the logging that has taken place in the barrens, that the greater intensity of fire that I am postulating could also have been the result of the aftermath of logging. I am wondering if you know, or if anybody knows, if after repeated generations of growth under these conditions, if there is some genetic dwarfing taking place or is it purely because of growing conditions? The idea is not Lamarckian selection. It is like the loss of eyes in blind cave fish. They are did not lose because the eyes are useless in the dark, they lost their eyes because it is more energy efficient to not grow them when they do not provide a benefit. In the case of the pines, perhaps it is more efficient in some ways to not try to grow full sized trees, therefore those that are predisposed to have a small size have been selected for resulting in a degree of dwarfism? Ed http://nature-web-network.blogspot.com/
http://primalforests.ning.com/
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957 <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957>

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Edward Frank <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:14 AM
    *Subject:* Re: [ENTS] Beautiful stunted Pitch Pines

    Larry,
They are similar because in these pitch pine communities are
    natural fires that mess with the soil structure, while at Marion
    Brook there was a condition created by timbering that enabled a
    severe fire to take place.  Pitch Pine communities in general
    are fire dependant systems. Without the fires the pitch pines are
    displaced by other less fire tolerant species. Whether or not this
    particular small patch in the pine barrens has lousy soil because
    of natural burning or because of human caused situation, the soil
    is still lousy because of burning.  You can't deny that the area
    has been logged.  If one area is dramatically different in size in
    one small patch than it is in adjacent areas, it is not
    unreasonable that this area was affected by fires of greater
intensity than the surrounding areas, or affected more recently. There is no other good explanation for this particular patch to be
    more stunted than are the trees in adjacent areas given the same
    basic geology and water conditions. You can't dismiss the idea
    that this was related to human activity, just because the pine
    community also burns naturally.  Most certainly the analogy is
    valid and there are similarities between the two areas.  That is
    how you examine question by contrasting and comparing areas with
    similar but not identical situations.
Edward Frank http://nature-web-network.blogspot.com/
    http://primalforests.ning.com/
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957
    <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957>

        ----- Original Message -----
        *From:* x <mailto:[email protected]>
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Saturday, January 09, 2010 11:46 PM
        *Subject:* Re: [ENTS] Beautiful stunted Pitch Pines

        most of that area has naturally poor sandy soils and has
        naturally burned for centuries on top of that, it had stunted
        growth at the time of the first new European settlers arrival
in some areas down there no trees grows above 4-5' or so and
        even in an average area they are always stunted to some extent
        over large portions of the region
it's one of the very few totally natural stunted pitch pine
        areas, it's nothing at all like Marion Brooks
-Larry
        *From:* Edward Frank <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Saturday, January 09, 2010 11:13 PM
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [ENTS] Beautiful stunted Pitch Pines

        Barry,
Do you think the smaller stunted trees are similar in age to
        the larger ones nearby?  Sometimes stunting is because of high
        acidity or some exotic mineral formed from the weathering of
        the bedrock. There should not be that drastic of a difference
        geologically in this location to cause the stunting.  In this
        location, I do not think they are stunted because of lack of
        water.  From the setting it looks as if they would not need to
        develop very long roots to reach water - so that is not a
        likely explanation.
The best suggestion I can make is that this particular area
        had been subject to a severe fire, maybe from a big brush pile
after logging or just brush itself that grew after logging. If the fire is severe enough it will destroy the organic
        components of the soil and the soil structure leaving behind a
        mineral soil that will not support many plant species.  These
        are first occupied by some pioneering species, but it will
        take decades to a couple hundred years before the soil
        rebuilds enough to support "normal" vegetation.  This is what
        happened at Marion Brooks Natural Area in central
        Pennsylvania.  After eighty or ninety years there are still
        large section that only are growing  blueberries and bracken
        fern.  What trees that are present in the worst hit areas are
paper birch and to a lesser extent pitch pine. In your area of the pine barrens the succession is likely
        first some of the lichens and hedges, then perhaps the pitch
        pines.  But just because they will sprout there does not mean
        they will grow well.  The trees in these areas are typically
        stunted by the poor nutrients and nature of the soil.  I think
        that is what is happening here.  These trees are stunted
        because they are growing in an area particularly hard hit by
        fires that ruined the soil structure.
Ed http://nature-web-network.blogspot.com/
        http://primalforests.ning.com/
        http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957
        <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=709156957>

Reply via email to