Hi there. It is difficult isn't it. Especially when the stuff weighs so damn much. The camera bag I tote around normally has two Kodak DCS-520s (Canon D2000s), a 17-35f2.8, 28-70f2.8, 70-200f2.8 and a 85/f1.8 plus a 550ex flash, Canon power charger thing and then a Sony Vaio C1 (just upgraded to their new Crusoe model, yet haven't installed the gubbins on it). A 1.4x extender just in case too. Access to other lenses from 14mm2.8 up to Canon's 500f4 and even a mammoth 2000/f11 Nikkon for when you want to watch what they are doing in France from England;) But it weighs a lot and airlines don't like me. I used to carry a 35-350 variable until getting the 28-70/70-200. I miss the 'extra length' and can see times where the 28-70/70-200 will be 'dumped' in favour of the generalist lens. Is it me or are monopods harder to use than holding it in your hand?? Darren Ingram Darren Ingram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) M2 Communications Ltd - http://www.M2.com CURRENT LOCATION: M2 Coventry, England +44 24 7623 8200 ! The views and opinions expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect those of M2 Communications Ltd/De synpunkter och �sikter som framkommer i det h�r e-post meddelandet delas inte n�dv�ndigtvis av M2 Communications Ltd. Shawn Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/12/00 12:10 Please respond to eos To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: EOS PJ lenses Well the standard issue at most newspapers that hand out equipment is a couple of camera bodies a 17-35/2.8, am 70(80)-200/2.8, and lighting equipment. Some will have 14mm, especially papers that are digital, and * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
