snipped----
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/20/00 11:14AM >>>
>>>I get amazed at what gets dumped on the EF 75-300 IS.
>>> I do wonder whether possible
>>>variences in manufacture (or perhaps previous rental history of
>>>the 75-300 IS, though it's not clear that that one had been
>>>rented.)
>>>Bill Jameson
Must be big differences in manufacuting from lens to lens. I had the 70-300IS and it
was soft. I was never happy with it at all. Luckily I unloaded it on e-Bay for only
about $100 less than I paid for it new. I went right for the 70-20 2.8L and have not
looked back once. The construction was pretty flimsy too. I guess I was used to the
metal and glass on the old FD lenses. I could never extend a FD zoom and have the end
of the barrel move up and down by pushing it. Oh well....
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
