At 04:59 PM 1/12/01, Ken wrote:
> >At a couple hundred dollars difference, what is the opinion of you
> >experienced with such matters as to what I would be sacrificing by not
> >buying the 100mm Macro USM, and just buying the AF version? Is it a
> >lot louder? Slower?
Ken, I tried and tried to like non-USM lenses. I tried and tried to like
non-Canon lenses. Even the best of Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, et al do not
measure up to Canon's USM and "L" serices. I have vowed that, regardless
of price, I will not be lured into a false sense of saving some bucks when
buying lenses. Of course you know this just by trying a non-USM lens. But
I thought you might like some reassurances.
Gary Thurlow
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
